(Charles Rogers Medal of Honor Recipient) Most people think of Charles Rogers as a hero of the World War II era whose name is already a household term, so much so that it used to be consistently used in war films, war documentaries, and various textbooks. Yet, unforeseen developments have raised doubts about all these assumptions.
The Department of Defense’s decision to pull the Medal of Honor tribute to his heroics from its website was a swift action that is hard to explain to most people, leaving questions unanswered
Highlights:

The Bravery of Charles Rogers (Charles Rogers Medal of Honor Recipient)
The passing of time has done nothing but suffice to glorify this valorous war figure. Charles Calvin Rogers was no regular soldier; he was a pioneer. Rogers was born on September 6, 1929, in Claremont, West Virginia.
The Easterners decided to choose him as a high leader in the company. This was his major display of bravery in a war during the Vietnam War on November 1, 1968. Lt. Col. Rogers was commanding his 1st Battalion, 5th Field Artillery Regiment when one day, he proved this feat.
Pushing through an enemy assault near the Cambodian border, he demonstrated unusual courage that was bound to be the proud moment beyond the war after the attackers were repelled. He didn’t just push through insurmountable circumstances but also led his squad by example and thus earned the Medal of Honor on May 14, 1970.
Charles Rogers was a hero on the battlefield and a social activist in the military sector who strongly supported equal rights for men and women.
He worked hard for equal race and gender rights in the military because he believed that a cohesive unit with many differences would always become a stronger force. His dedication to these principles made him a military hero and a beacon of progress within the armed forces.
What happened to his online tribute (Charles Rogers Medal of Honor Recipient)
The removal of the entire web page dedicated to him and Rick Allen is a completely mysterious or perplexing move that the Department of Defense has recently made. A recent act by the Department of Defense has confused many out there.
The website of the military department, which honors the decorated Major General Charles Rogers with a special zone, is no longer available. Instead, it returns a “404” error notice. It is this abrupt disappearance that reflects the withdrawal of a presidential initiative that intended to tear down barriers and give room to marginalized people.
However, a minority is the only one that got hurt in this game. The poor and the needful have yet to receive the info on what move involves this action because the Department of Defense has kept silent.
The Larger Picture and the Reaction to the Removal (Charles Rogers Medal of Honor Recipient)
Finally, this removed tribute of the hero is considered to be isolated. As he continues to work in the Department of Labor and Human Resource Development, DEI programs should be part of the institutional fabric for all federal agencies and contractors.
The dismissal of General Charles Rogers is neither the only case nor the major one. For weeks now, the Defense Department has just announced that Minister of Defense Hege Nyquist will dismantle the DEI programs and appoint other female and minority leaders out of the Pentagon.
This happened despite former defense officials disapproving of the policy because it would not be the best for the Army, destabilizing team spirit and impacting fighting power.
Reaction to the Removal of the Page
The public’s reaction has been one of anger and confusion. It is viewed mainly as an erasing attempt by the powers to hide some nonwhite accomplishments in military history, such as the significant contribution of the skew in the demography of the Army.
The delegitimization of black voices is the order of the day in military history and policy issues. The government’s silence on the subject has not stopped people from calling for the page to be AEDIS, putting back up, and wanting the truth.
The Future and Legacy of the Military DEI Programs
The DEI initiative has raised concerns over streamlining the military service with bodies of different races and ethnicities. The government is blamed for ending such initiatives because recruitment would become less effective without them.
Moreover, some marginalized groups may get discouraged from joining certain armed forces. The trend of reasons is a serious example of a policy change and its effect on identifying and remembering minority contributions to the national defense.
Thus, the Major General Charles Rogers’s Medal of Honor Tribute withdrawal from the Department of Defense website may be subject to much controversy, but it has also become a starting point for talks on politics, military history, and diversity programs.
Amid questions and issues that we are dealing with as Americans, let us not forget the brave and consequential sacrifices that contestations like that of Rogers have invariably impacted the flow and outcomes of history.
Leave a Reply